Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Detailed, interpretable characterization of mid-circuit measurement on a transmon qubit
arXiv
Authors: Piper C. Wysocki, Luke D. Burkhart, Madeline H. Morocco, Corey I. Ostrove, Riley J. Murray, Tristan Brown, Jeffrey M. Gertler, David K. Kim, Nathan E. Miller, Bethany M. Niedzielski, Katrina M. Sliwa, Robin Blume-Kohout, Gabriel O. Samach, Mollie E. Schwartz, Kenneth M. Rudinger
Year
2026
Paper ID
2901
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
158
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Mid-circuit measurements (MCMs) are critical components of the quantum error correction protocols expected to enable utility-scale quantum computing. MCMs can be modeled by quantum instruments (a type of quantum operation or process), which can be characterized self-consistently using gate set tomography. However, experimentally estimated quantum instruments are often hard to interpret or relate to device physics. We address this challenge by adapting the error generator formalism - previously used to interpret noisy quantum gates by decomposing their error processes into physically meaningful sums of "elementary errors" - to MCMs. We deploy our new analysis on a transmon qubit device to tease out and quantify error mechanisms including amplitude damping, readout error, and imperfect collapse. We examine in detail how the magnitudes of these errors vary with the readout pulse amplitude, recover the key features of dispersive readout predicted by theory, and show that these features can be modeled parsimoniously using a reduced model with just a few parameters.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Mid-circuit measurements (MCMs) are critical components of the quantum error correction protocols expected to enable utility-scale quantum computing.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.