Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Test of Common Sense in Quantum Copying Process
arXiv
Authors: Mi-Ra Hwang, Eylee Jung, Kap Soo Jang, Mu-Seong Kim, DaeKil Park, Eui-Soon Yim, Hungsoo Kim, Jin-Woo Son
Year
2010
Paper ID
28764
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
143
Citations
N/A
Abstract
It is believed that the more we have {\it a priori} information on input states, the better we can make the quality of clones in quantum cloning machines. This common sense idea was confirmed several years ago by analyzing a situation, where the input state is either one of two non-orthogonal states. If the {\it a priori} information is measured by the Shannon entropy, common sense predicts that the quality of the clone becomes poorer with increasing N, where N is the number of possible input states. We show, however, that the {\it a priori} information measured by the Shannon entropy does not affect the quality of the clones. Instead the no-cloning theorem and `denseness' of the possible input states play important roles in determining the quality. Specifically, the factor `denseness' plays a more crucial role than the no-cloning theorem when N geq 3.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2010 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- It is believed that the more we have it a priori information on input states, the better we can make the quality of clones in quantum cloning machines.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.