Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Control Pulse Engineering
Optimal Control in Nearly-Adiabatic Two-Level Quantum Systems via Time-Dependent Resonance
arXiv
Authors: Takayuki Suzuki
Year
2024
Paper ID
287
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
91
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this study, we theoretically analyzed a control protocol based on "time-dependent resonance" in nearly adiabatic two-level quantum systems, demonstrating that it exhibits properties equivalent to adiabatic control. This protocol is based on "time-dependent resonance", where the frequency corresponds to the time-dependent energy gap. Through numerical calculations, we showed that this protocol serves as an optimal control protocol. This approach enables efficient and high-precision transitions to the target state. Our findings provide a new perspective on quantum optimal control theory and suggest potential applications in qubit controls and quantum information processing.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Control & Pulse Engineering research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this study, we theoretically analyzed a control protocol based on "time-dependent resonance" in nearly adiabatic two-level quantum systems, demonstrating that it exhibits...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.