Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Entanglement is not sufficient for most practical entanglement-based QKD protocols
arXiv
Authors: Shubhayan Sarkar, Tushita Prasad, Karol Horodecki
Year
2026
Paper ID
28686
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
216
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum key distribution (QKD) is the most explored application of quantum information theory. A central problem in entanglement-based QKD (EB-QKD), is whether every entangled state can be used to extract a key. We observe that entanglement is not sufficient for standard practical EB-QKD protocols where the input choices are announced by the parties that want to share a secure key, such as E91 or entanglement-based BB84 type protocols, when even an arbitrarily small amount of leakage of classical side information occurs. We do this by identifying a class of two-qubit isotropic states that are entangled but cannot be used to distil the key under such protocols for any possible measurement by the parties. Counter-intuitively, this gap persists even when the leakage occurs from the "junk" rounds of the protocol, i.e, rounds that cannot be used to generate any key. We then extend this result to arbitrary dimensions and parties by identifying a class of isotropic states that are not useful to extract a secure key under such protocols, even if they are entangled. Finally, we demonstrate that our approach provides a tool to upper-bound the scalability of repeater-based QKD architectures in a protocol-independent manner. Interestingly, we find that allowing for even a tiny noise in the preparation drastically reduces the scalability of the QKD network.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum key distribution (QKD) is the most explored application of quantum information theory.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.