Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Towards Studying Superconductivity in the Fermi-Hubbard Model on Rydberg Atoms
arXiv
Authors: Kübra Yeter-Aydeniz, Nora M. Bauer
Year
2026
Paper ID
28674
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
182
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present a method for calculating the ground state energy of the Fermi-Hubbard model leveraging Rydberg atom processors and sample-based quantum diagonalization (SQD). By exploiting the perturbative relationship between the Fermi-Hubbard and Heisenberg models, the procedure samples from the Heisenberg model as prepared on the Rydberg atom processor, and uses the samples to diagonalize the Fermi-Hubbard model for large U. We include anisotropy and next-nearest-neighbor interactions and discuss the relevant regime for quasi-superconductivity in the 1-dimensional Fermi- Hubbard model. Numerical and experimental results on the Aquila quantum processor are presented for ground state energy calculations as well as the chemical potential. We find that the Heisenberg model sampling in the studied regime is sufficient to converge near to the ground state for up to 56 qubits, and we see a clear advantage of Rydberg atom sampling as opposed to random sampling even with 10x more samples for diagonalization. We also present a gate-based implementation of the gate-based SQD algorithm on IBM Quantum hardware for 56-qubit Hubbard model as a benchmark. Finally, we provide a gap analysis for studying emergent superconductivity using this method.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present a method for calculating the ground state energy of the Fermi-Hubbard model leveraging Rydberg atom processors and sample-based quantum diagonalization (SQD).
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.