You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Four-state discrimination for a pair of spin qubits via gate reflectometry
arXiv
Authors: Aritra Sen, András Pályi
Year
2026
Paper ID
28620
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
155
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Single-electron spin qubits defined in quantum dots are used as building blocks of a semiconductor-based quantum computer. Readout in a scaled-up version of such a quantum computer is expected to rely on the Pauli Spin Blockade (PSB) mechanism. A desired functionality of PSB readout is that it reveals two bits of information on the two spin qubits that are involved in the process, such that the four computational basis states can be discriminated. In this work, we propose and quantitatively analyze an experimental procedure, based on gate reflectometry, which enables this four-state discrimination in a single measurement. We provide an intuitive recipe to maximize the contrast between the quantum capacitances of the four basis states. Focusing on silicon double quantum dots equipped with a micromagnet, we quantify how amplifier noise and phonon-mediated relaxation influence readout fidelity. Our results highlight a realistic opportunity to mitigate the overhead of readout ancilla qubits in a spin-based quantum computer.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Single-electron spin qubits defined in quantum dots are used as building blocks of a semiconductor-based quantum computer.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.