Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum-limited estimation of the difference between photonic momenta via spatially resolved two-photon interference
arXiv
Authors: Luca Maggio, Vincenzo Tamma
Year
2026
Paper ID
28591
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
88
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present a quantum sensing protocol for three-dimensional estimation of the difference between the momenta of two photons based on spatially resolved interferometric sampling measurements. The protocol attains ultimate quantum precision in the simultaneous estimation of the components of the relative momentum for any values of the parameters already with sim 2000 sampling measurements and a bias below 1\%. These results identify 3D spatially resolved two-photon interference as an efficient tool for multi-parameter quantum sensing, with potential applications in high-precision 3D localization, refractometry, and near-field calibration in free-space quantum technologies.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present a quantum sensing protocol for three-dimensional estimation of the difference between the momenta of two photons based on spatially resolved interferometric sampling...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.