Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance

Scalable Postselection of Quantum Resources

arXiv
Authors: J. Wilson Staples, Winston Fu, Jeff D. Thompson

Year

2026

Paper ID

28581

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

175

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The large overhead imposed by quantum error correction is a critical challenge to the realization of quantum computers, and motivates searching for alternative error correcting codes and fault-tolerant circuit constructions. Postselection is a powerful tool that builds large programs out of probabilistically generated sub-circuits, and has been shown to increase the threshold of quantum error correction based on fusing fixed-size resource states or concatenated codes. In this work, we present an approach to lower the overhead of quantum computing using scalable postselection, based on directly postselecting sub-circuits with a size extensive in the code distance using decoder soft information. We introduce a metric, the partial gap, that estimates what the logical gap of a resource state will be after it is consumed, and show that postselection based on the partial gap leads to scalable improvements in the logical error rate. In the specific context of implementing logical gates via teleportation through a cluster state, we demonstrate that scalable postselection provides a $4\times$ reduction in the overhead per logical gate, at the same logical error probability.

Paper Tools

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Compare Add to Reading List

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #28581 #35400 Building a spin quantum bit reg... #35396 Fault tolerance with noisy and ... #35393 Topological quantum hashing wit... #35390 Clustered error correction of c...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.