Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Universal Non-stabilizerness Dynamics Across Quantum Phase Transitions

arXiv
Authors: András Grabarits, Adolfo del Campo

Year

2026

Paper ID

28573

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

116

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Quantum magic and non-stabilizerness are important quantum resources that characterize computational power beyond classically simulable Clifford operations and are therefore essential for achieving quantum advantage. While non-stabilizerness has so far been investigated only at equilibrium, here we extend its dynamics to time-dependent drivings across quantum phase transitions. In particular, we show that the stabilizer Rényi entropies and the cumulants of the Pauli spectrum exhibit universal power-law scaling with the driving rate in slow processes. Moreover, we show that the logarithmic Pauli spectrum is asymptotically Gaussian, implying a lognormal distribution for the Pauli spectrum values. Our results are explicitly demonstrated by exact results in the transverse-field Ising model and by analytical approximations in long-range Kitaev models.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Quantum magic and non-stabilizerness are important quantum resources that characterize computational power beyond classically simulable Clifford operations and are therefore...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #28573

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.