Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Tight Quantum Speed Limit for Ergotropy Charging in the N-Qubit Dicke Battery
arXiv
Authors: Anass Jad, Abderrahim El Allati
Year
2026
Paper ID
28493
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
114
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We derive and analytically prove a tight quantum speed limit (QSL) for ergotropy charging in the N-qubit Dicke quantum battery: the first-passage time to normalised ergotropy ε satisfies τ*(ε) geq sqrt{Nε}/\(2λsqrt{bar{n}}\), where λ is the coupling and bar{n} is the mean charger photon number. The bound follows from an exact perturbative identity ε(t) = Aλ2bar{n}t2 + mathcal{O}((λt)4), where A=4/N is the short-time ergotropy coefficient, combined with a global upper bound proved analytically for all N. The composite parameter ΓN = 2λsqrt{bar{n}/N} is the unique figure of merit for charging speed; all protocols collapse onto ΓN τ* geq sqrtε, with the bound saturated to within 1% at small ε.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We derive and analytically prove a tight quantum speed limit (QSL) for ergotropy charging in the N-qubit Dicke quantum battery: the first-passage time to normalised ergotropy ε...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.