Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
First-Principles Electronegativity Scale from the Atomic Mean Inner Potential
arXiv
Authors: Jin-Cheng Zheng
Year
2026
Paper ID
28486
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
169
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Electronegativity is a cornerstone of chemical intuition, essential for rationalizing bonding, reactivity, and material properties. However, prevailing scales remain empirically derived, often relying on parameterized models or composite physical quantities. In this work, we introduce a universal electronegativity scale founded on the atomic mean inner potential (AMIP), also known as the average Coulomb potential, a fundamental, quantum-mechanical property accessible through both first-principles computation and electron-scattering experiments. Our scale, denoted χAMIP,p, is an analytic function of just three ground-state atomic descriptors and carries explicit physical units. It demonstrates excellent agreement with established scales and successfully classifies bonding types across 358 compounds, including adherence to the metalloid "Si rule". Beyond replicating known trends, χAMIP,1/2 proves to be a powerful predictive tool, accurately determining Lewis acid strengths for over 14,000 coordination environments $R2=0.93$ and γ-ray annihilation spectral widths for 36 elements $R2=0.97$, outperforming previous methods. By linking electronegativity directly to a measurable quantum property, this work provides a unified and predictive descriptor for electronic structure and chemical behavior across the periodic table.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Electronegativity is a cornerstone of chemical intuition, essential for rationalizing bonding, reactivity, and material properties.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.