Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Is the existence of unbounded operators a problem for quantum mechanics? In response to Carcassi, Calderon, and Aidala
arXiv
Authors: Zhonghao Lu
Year
2026
Paper ID
28482
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
170
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this paper I argue against Carcassi, Calderon, and Aidala's recent claim that the Hilbert spaces are unphysical and should be replaced with the Schwartz spaces in quantum mechanics, since Hilbert spaces include states with infinite expectation values for certain observables. I also review and discuss issues regarding unbounded operators in quantum mechanics raised by Streater and Wightman, Heathcote, and Lemos. I argue that the existence of infinite expectation values does not cause problems in quantum mechanics. On the other hand, replacing the Hilbert spaces with the Schwartz spaces would cause more issues, as it would exclude a class of meaningful Hamiltonian evolutions. I also discuss the question in literature whether reformulating quantum mechanics with essentially self-adjoint operators instead of self-adjoint operators may cause problems. I further analyse the hierarchies of the notions of "physicality" and possibility in fundamental physics, and suggest that "physicality" is a vague concept. Finally, I connect the problem raised by Carcassi, Calderon, and Aidala with the problem of the Hadamard condition in quantum field theory.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this paper I argue against Carcassi, Calderon, and Aidala's recent claim that the Hilbert spaces are unphysical and should be replaced with the Schwartz spaces in quantum...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.