Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Self-testing with untrusted random number generators
arXiv
Authors: Moisés Bermejo Morán, Ravishankar Ramanathan
Year
2026
Paper ID
28477
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
135
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Self-testing--the attractive possibility to infer the underlying physics of a quantum device in a black-box scenario--has gained increased traction in recent years, with applications to device-independent quantum information processing. Thus far, self-testing has been done under the assumption that the settings for the requisite Bell test are chosen freely and independently of the device tested in the experiment. That is, the random number generator used to generate the settings has been assumed to have no correlations with the device tested. Here, we extend self-testing protocols beyond the independence assumption. Surprisingly, we show that all pure bipartite partially entangled states can be self-tested provided that the random number generator obeys a residual randomness constraint strictly weaker than the independence assumption. This in itself provides a semi-device-independent certification of independence between the randomness source and the device.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Self-testing--the attractive possibility to infer the underlying physics of a quantum device in a black-box scenario--has gained increased traction in recent years, with...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.