Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Hall conductance in a weakly time-reversal invariant open system

arXiv
Authors: Alexander Fagerlund, Christopher Ekman, Rodrigo Arouca

Year

2026

Paper ID

28447

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

126

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The quantum Hall effect and the quantum anomalous Hall effect both require time-reversal invariance to be broken. We show that non-equilibrium effects can cause Hall physics to arise even when the system is weakly time-reversal symmetric and no magnetic field is applied. In our model, this occurs due to a fermionic subsystem breaking time-reversal invariance even if the system as a whole does not. The fermions receive a TRI-breaking self-energy, caused by interactions with bosonic degrees of freedom in the system and with an external reservoir. As a result, the fermions develop a non-quantized Hall conductance. We demonstrate that, unlike in the equilibrium case, the presence of a mass term is insufficient for the Hall conductance to appear, and wave-function renormalization effects have to be included.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The quantum Hall effect and the quantum anomalous Hall effect both require time-reversal invariance to be broken.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #28447

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.