Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Noise Correlations as a Resource in Pauli-Twirled Circuits
arXiv
Authors: Antoine Brillant, Rohan N Rajmohan, Peter Groszkowski, Alireza Seif, Jens Koch, Aashish Clerk
Year
2026
Paper ID
28395
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
155
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Randomized compiling (RC) is an established tool to tailor arbitrary quantum noise channels into Pauli errors. The effect of both spatial and temporal noise correlations in randomly compiled circuits, however, is not fully understood. Here, we show that for a broad class of correlated Gaussian noise, RC reduces both the strength and temporal range of correlations. For Clifford circuits, we derive a simple analytical expression for the circuit fidelity of randomly compiled circuits. Surprisingly, we show that this fidelity is always increased by the presence of correlations, suggesting that correlations are a resource in randomly compiled circuits. To leading order in system-bath coupling, we also show that RC suppresses the quantum component of bath correlations, implying that one can safely treat weak noise as being classical. Finally, through extensive numerical simulations, we show that our results remain valid for many relevant non-Clifford circuits. These results clarify how RC mitigates memory effects and enhances circuit robustness.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Randomized compiling (RC) is an established tool to tailor arbitrary quantum noise channels into Pauli errors.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.