Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Quantum lower bounds for simulating fluid dynamics
arXiv
Authors: Abtin Ameri, Joseph Carolan, Andrew M. Childs, Hari Krovi
Year
2026
Paper ID
28385
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
178
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Developing quantum algorithms to simulate fluid dynamics has become an active area of research, as accelerating fluid simulations could have significant impact in both industry and fundamental science. While many approaches have been proposed for simulating fluid dynamics on quantum computers, it is largely unclear whether these algorithms will provide speedup over existing classical approaches. In this paper we give evidence that quantum computers cannot significantly outperform classical simulations of fluid dynamics in general. We study two models of fluids: the Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) equation, which models shallow water waves, and the incompressible Euler equations, which model ideal, inviscid fluids. We show that any quantum algorithm simulating the KdV equation or the Euler equations for time T requires Ω\(T2\) and eΩ(T) copies of the initial state in the worst case, respectively. These lower bounds hold for the task of preparing the final state, and similar bounds hold for history state preparation. We prove the lower bound for the KdV equation by investigating divergence of solitons. For the Euler equations, we show that instabilities enable fast state discrimination.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Developing quantum algorithms to simulate fluid dynamics has become an active area of research, as accelerating fluid simulations could have significant impact in both industry...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.