Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Thermalisation as Diffusion in Hilbert Space
arXiv
Authors: Aleksey Lunkin
Year
2026
Paper ID
28379
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
99
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We develop a microscopic theory of thermalisation for a thermometer coupled to a many-body bath beyond standard Markovian and Fermi-golden-rule assumptions. By modeling interaction matrix elements in the non-interacting basis as independent random variables, we derive a diffusion-propagator expression for the reduced dynamics and show that relaxation is controlled by the distribution of interaction-induced level broadenings. The theory predicts a thermalisation timescale set by the inverse typical broadening and yields a non-Markovian generalization of global balance. Exact-diagonalization tests for heavy-tailed L{é}vy couplings, an all-to-all transverse-field Ising model, and the one-dimensional Imbrie model show good agreement with these predictions.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We develop a microscopic theory of thermalisation for a thermometer coupled to a many-body bath beyond standard Markovian and Fermi-golden-rule assumptions.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.