Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum State Preparation Representation
Benchmarking Verification Validation
Quantum Machine Learning
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN MENGGUNAKAN QUANTUM LEARNING TEKNIK MIND MAPPING DENGAN COOPERATIVE LEARNING TEKNIK JIGSAW DI SMP NEGERI 18 TANGERANG
DOAJ
Authors: Ahmad Fahrudin
Year
2017
Paper ID
28341
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
114
Citations
N/A
Abstract
ABSTRACTThis study aims to determine there are or not differences math student’s learning outcomes that use Mind Mapping technique Quantum Learning and Cooperative Learning Jigsaw technique. Prior to this study given to the object of study, first conducted test instruments that the validity tests and reliability testing. Before the data analyzed, first tested the requirement that test Lilliefors normality test and homogeneity test by using Fisher's exact test. Based on hypothesis testing using t test obtained t = 5,049 > 1,993 = t(0,05;73. This means H0 reject or accept H1. So, the results of this study concluded that there are differences math student’s learning outcomes that used Mind Mapping technique Quantum Learning and Cooperative Learning Jigsaw technique.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- ABSTRACTThis study aims to determine there are or not differences math student’s learning outcomes that use Mind Mapping technique Quantum Learning and Cooperative Learning...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.