Quick Navigation
Topics
Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing
Quantum Machine Learning
Quantum Chemistry
Quantum Device Fabrication Process Engineering
The Polymerase Chain Reaction Combined With Quantum Dot Fluorescence Analysis Method for Rapid Detection of Multiple Urinary Tract Infection Pathogens in Children.
PubMed
Authors: Li C, Yin H, Yu P, Meng Q, Ye Q, Zhao F, Wang C
Year
2026
Paper ID
28276
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
147
Citations
N/A
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Identifying the pathogens responsible for urinary tract infections (UTIs) using urine culture methods is time-consuming, and delayed diagnosis significantly impacts patient outcomes. METHODS: We developed a novel platform that combines PCR amplification products with quantum dot fluorescence for hybridization-Polymerase Chain Reaction Combined with Quantum Dot Fluorescence Analysis (PCRQDFA), enabling rapid and efficient detection of pathogenic bacteria in urine. To evaluate the performance of this technique, 294 urine samples from children with UTI were collected and tested using PCR-QDFA and traditional culture methods. RESULTS: Compared to culture, the consistency rate of PCR-QDFA was 86.73%, with a sensitivity of 86.98% and a specificity of 86.4%. For common pathogens such as Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecium, Proteus mirabilis, and Enterobacter cloacae, the consistency rates exceeded 95%. CONCLUSION: The PCR-QDFA assay has proven to be a reliable tool for the rapid diagnosis of urinary pathogens in children with suspected urinary tract infections.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- BACKGROUND: Identifying the pathogens responsible for urinary tract infections (UTIs) using urine culture methods is time-consuming, and delayed diagnosis significantly impacts...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.