Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Software Tools Programming
More on OTOCs and Chaos in Quantum Mechanics - Magnetic Fields
arXiv
Authors: Cameron Beetar, Jeff Murugan
Year
2026
Paper ID
2820
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
101
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We revisit thermal out-of-time-order correlators (OTOCs) in single-particle quantum systems, focusing on magnetic billiards. Using the stadium billiard as a testbed, we compute the thermal OTOC CT(t) = -langle [x(t), p]2 rangle_β and extract Lyapunov-like exponents λL that quantify early-time growth. We map out λL(T, B), revealing a crossover from quantum chaos to magnetic rigidity. In parallel, we compute an alternative OTOC built from guiding-center operators, which exhibits qualitatively distinct dynamics and no exponential growth. Our results offer a controlled framework for probing scrambling, temperature dependence, and the interplay of geometry and magnetic fields in quantum systems.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Software Tools & Programming research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We revisit thermal out-of-time-order correlators (OTOCs) in single-particle quantum systems, focusing on magnetic billiards.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.