Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Chemistry
Clarifying Photodetachment in Al(13)(-) Anions and Photoionization in Al(13) Neutrals Using Diffusion Monte Carlo.
PubMed
Authors: Chiong MR 3rd, Nakajima A, Morikawa Y
Year
2026
Paper ID
28188
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
163
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Aluminum clusters (Al) represent prototypical superatomic behaviors at = 13, where their molecular electronic states mimic atomic shells. Specifically, Al has been regarded as the "superhalogen archetype", yet its fundamental properties remain controversial. Reported energies for the photodetachment of Al anions and the photoionization of Al neutrals vary widely across density functional and correlated wave function methods, and even the underlying structural assignments remain disputed. Here, we employ diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) with multideterminant trial wave functions to resolve these discrepancies. DMC reproduces the experimental adiabatic detachment energy of Al and reconciles the vertical detachment energy with experiment once vibronic effects are included. For the Al neutrals, we show that the measured ionization energy of 6.42 eV corresponds not to the photoionization into the ground state cap cation but to a strongly distorted cation of an oblate isomer, consistent with experimental photoionization mass spectra. These results settle long-standing benchmark controversies, and demonstrate the power of quantum Monte Carlo as a reference method for superatomic Al clusters.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Aluminum clusters (Al) represent prototypical superatomic behaviors at = 13, where their molecular electronic states mimic atomic shells.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.