Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Readout Measurement Hardware
Bell and EPR experiments with signalling data
arXiv
Authors: Lucas Maquedano, Sophie Egelhaaf, Amro Abou-Hachem, Jef Pauwels, Armin Tavakoli, Ana C. S. Costa, Roope Uola
Year
2026
Paper ID
2812
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
105
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The no-signalling principle is a fundamental assumption in Bell-inequality and quantum-steering experiments. Nonetheless, experimental imperfections can lead to apparent violations beyond those expected from finite-sample statistics. Here, we propose extensions of local hidden variable and local hidden state theories that allow for bounded, operationally quantifiable, amounts of signalling. We show how non-classicality tests can be developed for these models, both through exact methods based on the full set of observed statistics and through corrections to the standard Bell and steering inequalities. We demonstrate the applicability of these methods via two scenarios that feature apparent signalling: an IBM quantum processor and post-selected data from inefficient detectors.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Readout & Measurement Hardware research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The no-signalling principle is a fundamental assumption in Bell-inequality and quantum-steering experiments.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.