Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Simulation

Part I: Vector Analysis of Spinors

arXiv
Authors: Garret Sobczyk

Year

2015

Paper ID

28010

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

112

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Part I: The geometric algebra of space is derived by extending the real number system to include three mutually anticommuting square roots of plus one. The resulting geometric algebra is isomorphic to the algebra of complex 2x2 matrices, also known as the Pauli algebra. The so-called spinor algebra of C(2), the language of the quantum mechanics, is formulated in terms of the idempotents and nilpotents of the geometric algebra of space, including its beautiful representation on the Riemann sphere, and a new proof of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. In "Part II: Spacetime Algebra of Dirac Spinors", the ideas are generalized to apply to 4-component Dirac spinors, and their geometric interpretation in spacetime.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Part I: The geometric algebra of space is derived by extending the real number system to include three mutually anticommuting square roots of plus one.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #28010 #69599 Tensor network compression usin... #69594 A Collective-Spin Derivation of... #69593 Local correlations in long-rang... #69592 Direct/adaptive-mixture phase-g...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.