Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Exogenous Quantum Operator Logic Based on Density Operators
arXiv
Authors: Yunguo Lin, Yongming Li
Year
2015
Paper ID
27967
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
179
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Although quantum logic by using exogenous approach has been proposed for reasoning about closed quantum systems, an improvement would be worth to study quantum logic based on density operators instead of unit vectors in the state logic point of view. In order to achieve this, we build an exogenous quantum operator logic(EQOL) based on density operators for reasoning about open quantum systems. We show that this logic is sound and complete. Just as the exogenous quantum propositional logic(EQPL), by applying exogenous approach, EQOL is extended from the classical propositional logic, and is used to describe the state logic based on density operators. As its applications, we confirm the entanglement property about Bell states by reasoning and logical argument, also verify the existence of eavesdropping about the basic BB84 protocol. As a novel type of mathematical formalism for open quantum systems, we introduce an exogenous quantum Markov chain(EQMC) where its quantum states are labelled using EQOL formulae. Then, an example is given to illustrate the termination verification problem of a generalized quantum loop program described using EQMC.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Although quantum logic by using exogenous approach has been proposed for reasoning about closed quantum systems, an improvement would be worth to study quantum logic based on...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.