Quick Navigation

Overview Topics Abstract Importance Paper Tools References Reactions Discussion Publication

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Consistent bosonization-debosonization I: A resolution of the non-equilibrium transport puzzle

arXiv
Authors: Nayana Shah, C. J. Bolech

Year

2015

Paper ID

27816

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

91

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We critically reexamine the bosonization-debosonization procedure for systems including certain types of localized features (although more general scenarios are possible). By focusing on the case of a tunneling junction out of equilibrium, we show that the conventional approach gives results that are not consistent with the exact solution of the problem even at the qualitative level. We identify inconsistencies that can adversely affect the results of all types of calculations. We subsequently show a way to avoid these and proceed consistently. The extended framework we develop here should be widely applicable.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We critically reexamine the bosonization-debosonization procedure for systems including certain types of localized features (although more general scenarios are possible).

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Become a member Sign in
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

[1] DOI https://doi.org/arXiv:1508.03078 [2] arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.03078 [3] Publisher https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.03078

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #27816

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.