Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Optimizing Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm
arXiv
Authors: Hongye Hu, Biao Wu
Year
2015
Paper ID
27706
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
127
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In quantum adiabatic algorithm, as the adiabatic parameter s(t) changes slowly from zero to one with finite rate, a transition to excited states inevitably occurs and this induces an intrinsic computational error. We show that this computational error depends not only on the total computation time T but also on the time derivatives of the adiabatic parameter s(t) at the beginning and the end of evolution. Previous work Phys. Rev. A textbf{82}, 052305 also suggested this result. With six typical paths, we systematically demonstrate how to optimally design an adiabatic path to reduce the computational errors. Our method has a clear physical picture and also explains the pattern of computational error. In this paper we focus on quantum adiabatic search algorithm although our results are general.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In quantum adiabatic algorithm, as the adiabatic parameter s(t) changes slowly from zero to one with finite rate, a transition to excited states inevitably occurs and this...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.