Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
The Degree of Quantum Correlation Required to Speed-Up a Computation
arXiv
Authors: Alastair Kay
Year
2015
Paper ID
27614
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
139
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The one clean qubit model of quantum computation (DQC1) efficiently implements a computational task that is not known to have a classical alternative. During the computation, there is never more than a small but finite amount of entanglement present, and it is typically vanishingly small in the system size. In this paper, we demonstrate that there is nothing unexpected hidden within the DQC1 model - Grover's Search, when acting on a mixed state, provably exhibits a speed-up over classical with guarantees as to the presence of only vanishingly small amounts of quantum correlations (entanglement and quantum discord) - while arguing that this is not an artefact of the oracle-based construction. We also present some important refinements in the evaluation of how much entanglement may be present in DQC1, and how the typical entanglement of the system must be evaluated.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The one clean qubit model of quantum computation (DQC1) efficiently implements a computational task that is not known to have a classical alternative.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.