Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Discriminating quantum states: the multiple Chernoff distance
arXiv
Authors: Ke Li
Year
2015
Paper ID
27605
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
222
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We consider the problem of testing multiple quantum hypotheses \{ρ1otimes n,ldots,ρrotimes n\}, where an arbitrary prior distribution is given and each of the r hypotheses is n copies of a quantum state. It is known that the average error probability Pe decays exponentially to zero, that is, Pe=exp\{-ξn+o(n)\}. However, this error exponent ξ is generally unknown, except for the case that r=2. In this paper, we solve the long-standing open problem of identifying the above error exponent, by proving Nussbaum and Szkoła's conjecture that ξ=minineq jC\(ρi,ρj\). The right-hand side of this equality is called the multiple quantum Chernoff distance, and C\(ρi,ρj\):=max0leq sleq 1\{-logoperatorname{Tr}ρisρj1-s\} has been previously identified as the optimal error exponent for testing two hypotheses, ρiotimes n versus ρjotimes n. The main ingredient of our proof is a new upper bound for the average error probability, for testing an ensemble of finite-dimensional, but otherwise general, quantum states. This upper bound, up to a states-dependent factor, matches the multiple-state generalization of Nussbaum and Szkoła's lower bound. Specialized to the case r=2, we give an alternative proof to the achievability of the binary-hypothesis Chernoff distance, which was originally proved by Audenaert et al.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We consider the problem of testing multiple quantum hypotheses ρ1^otimes n,ldots,ρr^otimes n, where an arbitrary prior distribution is given and each of the r hypotheses is n...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.