Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Software Tools Programming
Bridging Quantum and Semi-Classical Thermodynamics in Cavity QED
arXiv
Authors: Marcelo Janovitch, Sander Stammbach, Matteo Brunelli, Patrick P. Potts
Year
2026
Paper ID
2737
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
116
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED), photons leaving the cavity can be irreversibly lost or reused as a power source. This dichotomy is reflected in two different thermodynamic bookkeepings of the light field, both corresponding to valid thermodynamic frameworks. In this work, we formulate a rigorous semi-classical limit of cavity QED and show that the resulting thermodynamic description may qualitatively differ from that of the fully quantised model. We find that violations of the thermodynamic uncertainty relations are recovered in the semi-classical limit only by one of the two thermodynamic frameworks: the one which treats part of the photon flux as a power source. We illustrate our findings in a three-level system coupled to a driven cavity.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Software Tools & Programming research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED), photons leaving the cavity can be irreversibly lost or reused as a power source.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.