Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Chemistry

Probing Scalar Coupling Differences via Long-Lived Singlet States

arXiv
Authors: Stephen J. DeVience, Ronald L. Walsworth, Matthew S. Rosen

Year

2015

Paper ID

27367

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

100

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We probe small scalar coupling differences via the coherent interactions between two nuclear spin singlet states in organic molecules. We show that the spin-lock induced crossing (SLIC) technique enables the coherent transfer of singlet order between one spin pair and another. The transfer is mediated by the difference in cis and trans vicinal J couplings among the spins. By measuring the transfer rate, we calculate a J coupling difference of 8 pm 2 mHz in phenylalanine-glycine-glycine and 2.57 pm 0.04 Hz in glutamate. We also characterize a coherence between two singlet states in glutamate, which may enable the creation of a long-lived quantum memory.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We probe small scalar coupling differences via the coherent interactions between two nuclear spin singlet states in organic molecules.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #27367 #69978 Distribution Complexity of Elec... #69971 Quantum-enhanced estimation of ... #69966 Schur--Horn bound on field-free... #69943 The moving Fermi polaron

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.