Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Bulk and surface loss in superconducting transmon qubits
arXiv
Authors: Oliver Dial, Douglas T. McClure, Stefano Poletto, Jay M. Gambetta, David W. Abraham, Jerry M. Chow, Matthias Steffen
Year
2015
Paper ID
27274
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
97
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Decoherence of superconducting transmon qubits is purported to be consistent with surface loss from two-level systems on the substrate surface. Here, we present a study of surface loss in transmon devices, explicitly designed to have varying sensitivities to different surface loss contributors. Our experiments also encompass two particular different sapphire substrates, which reveal the onset of a yet unknown additional loss mechanism outside of surface loss for one of the substrates. Tests across different wafers and devices demonstrate substantial variation, and we emphasize the importance of testing large numbers of devices for disentangling different sources of decoherence.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Decoherence of superconducting transmon qubits is purported to be consistent with surface loss from two-level systems on the substrate surface.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.