Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Channels Communication Theory
Beyond Wigner: Non-Invertible Symmetries Preserve Probabilities
arXiv
Authors: Thomas Bartsch, Yuhan Gai, Sakura Schafer-Nameki
Year
2026
Paper ID
2725
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
143
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In recent years, the traditional notion of symmetry in quantum theory was expanded to so-called generalised or categorical symmetries, which, unlike ordinary group symmetries, may be non-invertible. This appears to be at odds with Wigner's theorem, which requires quantum symmetries to be implemented by (anti)unitary - and hence invertible - operators in order to preserve probabilities. We resolve this puzzle for (higher) fusion category symmetries mathcal{C} by proposing that, instead of acting by unitary operators on a fixed Hilbert space, symmetry defects in mathcal{C} act as isometries between distinct Hilbert spaces constructed from twisted sectors. As a result, we find that non-invertible symmetries naturally act as trace-preserving quantum channels. Crucially, our construction relies on the symmetry category mathcal{C} being unitary. We illustrate our proposal through several examples that include Tambara-Yamagami, Fibonacci, and Yang-Lee as well as higher categorical symmetries.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Channels & Communication Theory research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In recent years, the traditional notion of symmetry in quantum theory was expanded to so-called generalised or categorical symmetries, which, unlike ordinary group symmetries...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.