Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

The meaning of "anomalous weak values" in quantum and classical theories

arXiv
Authors: D. Sokolovski

Year

2015

Paper ID

27206

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

116

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The readings of a highly inaccurate "weak" quantum meter, employed to determine the value of a dichotomous variable S without destroying the interference between the alternatives,may take arbitrary values. We show that the expected values of its readings may take any real value, depending on the the choice of the states in which the system is pre- and post-selected. Some of these values must fall outside the range of eigenvalues of A, in which case they may be expressed as "anomalous" averages obtained with negative probability weights, constructed from available probability amplitudes. This behaviour is a natural consequence of the Uncertainty Principle. The phenomenon of "anomalous weak values" has no non-trivial analogue in classical statistics.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The readings of a highly inaccurate "weak" quantum meter, employed to determine the value of a dichotomous variable S without destroying the interference between the...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #27206 #69983 Spectral Leakage and Masking Ef... #69982 Dimensionality Reduction of QAO... #69981 A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Appr... #69980 Complexity Inequalities for Qua...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.