Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Query Complexity of Subgraph Isomorphism and Homomorphism
arXiv
Authors: Raghav Kulkarni, Supartha Podder
Year
2015
Paper ID
27123
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
253
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Let H be a fixed graph on n vertices. Let fH(G) = 1 iff the input graph G on n vertices contains H as a (not necessarily induced) subgraph. Let αH denote the cardinality of a maximum independent set of H. In this paper we show: \[QfH = Ω\leftsqrt{αH cdot n}right,\] where Q\(fH\) denotes the quantum query complexity of fH. As a consequence we obtain a lower bounds for Q\(fH\) in terms of several other parameters of H such as the average degree, minimum vertex cover, chromatic number, and the critical probability. We also use the above bound to show that Q\(fH\) = Ω\(n3/4\) for any H, improving on the previously best known bound of Ω\(n2/3\). Until very recently, it was believed that the quantum query complexity is at least square root of the randomized one. Our Ω\(n3/4\) bound for Q\(fH\) matches the square root of the current best known bound for the randomized query complexity of fH, which is Ω\(n3/2\) due to Gröger. Interestingly, the randomized bound of Ω\(αH cdot n\) for fH still remains open. We also study the Subgraph Homomorphism Problem, denoted by f[H], and show that Q\(f[H]\) = Ω(n). Finally we extend our results to the 3-uniform hypergraphs. In particular, we show an Ω\(n4/5\) bound for quantum query complexity of the Subgraph Isomorphism, improving on the previously known Ω\(n3/4\) bound. For the Subgraph Homomorphism, we obtain an Ω\(n3/2\) bound for the same.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Let H be a fixed graph on n vertices.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.