Quick Navigation

Overview Topics Abstract Importance Paper Tools References Reactions Discussion Publication Related

Topics

Quantum Cryptography Security Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Design of Quantum Key Agreement Protocols with Strong Fairness Property

arXiv

Authors: Kun-Fei Yu, Chun-Wei Yang, Tzonelih Hwang, Chuan-Ming Li, Jun Gu

Year

2015

Paper ID

26813

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

Citations

N/A

Abstract

This study distinguishes the weak fairness property from the strong fairness property which is necessary in the quantum key agreement (QKA) and shows that most of the existing QKAs cannot achieve the strong fairness property with a key manipulation problem.To solve this problem, a model which describes the way to design a QKA with the strong fairness property is proposed. Based on the model, an example QKA is presented. Security analyses show that the proposed QKA is effective to resist not only outsider's eavesdropping attack but also insider's key manipulation.

Why This Paper Matters

This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
This study distinguishes the weak fairness property from the strong fairness property which is necessary in the quantum key agreement (QKA) and shows that most of the existing...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Become a member Sign in

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

[1] DOI https://doi.org/arXiv:1510.02353 [2] arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.02353 [3] Publisher https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.02353

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0

Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.