Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Chemistry

Optimizing electrically controlled echo sequences for the exchange-only qubit

arXiv
Authors: Niklas Rohling, Guido Burkard

Year

2015

Paper ID

26708

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

107

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Recently, West and Fong [New J. Phys. 14, 083002 (2012)] introduced an echo scheme for an exchange-only qubit, which relies entirely on the exchange-interaction. Here, we compare two different exchange-based sequences and two optimization strategies, Uhrig dynamical decoupling (UDD) and optimized filter function dynamical decoupling (OFDD), which were introduced for a single-spin qubit and are applied in this paper to the three-spin exchange-only qubit. The calculation shows that the adaption of the optimization concepts can be achieved by straight-forward calculation. We consider two types of noise spectra, Lorentzian and Ohmic noise. For both spectra, the results reveal a slight dependence of the performance on the choice of the echo sequence.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Recently, West and Fong [New J.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #26708 #69978 Distribution Complexity of Elec... #69971 Quantum-enhanced estimation of ... #69966 Schur--Horn bound on field-free... #69943 The moving Fermi polaron

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.