Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Entropy Information Measures
Defect relative entropy in symmetric orbifold CFTs
arXiv
Authors: Mostafa Ghasemi
Year
2026
Paper ID
2645
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
179
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this work, we compute the defect relative entropy between topological defects in the symmetric product orbifold CFT SymN(M) = Motimes N/SN. Our analysis covers two distinct classes of defects: universal defects, which realize the Rep\(SN\) non-invertible symmetry, and non-universal defects. We show that the defect relative entropy reduces to a Kullback--Leibler (KL) divergence. The resulting expression decomposes naturally into two contributions: one governed by characters of the symmetric group SN, and the other controlled by modular S-matrix elements of the seed RCFT. Remarkably, both sets of data appear as probability distributions, yielding an information-theoretic interpretation of permutation group data and modular data within the symmetric orbifold. The structure of the divergence depends sensitively on the defect class. For universal defects, only the permutation group data contributes; for maximally fractional defects, both permutation and modular data enter and together define the relevant probability distributions. This feature suggests that the maximally fractional defect can be understood as a kind of product of the RCFT defect and the symmetric orbifold defect.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Entropy & Information Measures research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this work, we compute the defect relative entropy between topological defects in the symmetric product orbifold CFT Sym^N(M) = M^otimes N/SN.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.