Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Momentum-Resolved and Correlations Spectroscopy Using Quantum Probes
arXiv
Authors: Francesco Cosco, Massimo Borrelli, Francesco Plastina, Sabrina Maniscalco
Year
2015
Paper ID
26345
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
99
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We address some key conditions under which many-body lattice models, intended mainly as simulated condensed matter systems, can be investigated via immersed, fully controllable quantum objects, namely quantum probes. First, we present a protocol that, for a certain class of many-body systems, allows for full momentum resolved spectroscopy using one single probe. Furthermore, we demonstrate how one can extract the two-point correlations using two entangled probes. We apply our theoretical proposal to two well-known exactly solvable lattice models, a 1D Kitaev chain and 2D superfluid Bose-Hubbard model, and show its accuracy as well as its robustness against external noise.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We address some key conditions under which many-body lattice models, intended mainly as simulated condensed matter systems, can be investigated via immersed, fully controllable...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.