Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Foundations

Analytic quantification of the singlet nonlocality for the first Bell's inequality

arXiv
Authors: Fernando Parisio

Year

2015

Paper ID

26330

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

127

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Recently an alternative way to quantify Bell nonlocality has been proposed \[Phys. Rev. A {\bf 92}, 030101(R) (2015)\]. In this work we further develop this concept, the volume of violation, and analytically calculate its value for the spin-singlet state with respect to the settings of the first Bell's inequality. These settings correspond to three directions in space, or three arbitrary points on the unit sphere. It is shown that the triples of directions that lead to violations in local causality correspond to 1/3 of all possible configurations. From the perspective of quantum communications, this means that two distant parties that were capable of align their measurements in one direction only (the remaining direction in each site being random), have a probability of about 33.3\% to be able to certify their entanglement.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Recently an alternative way to quantify Bell nonlocality has been proposed [Phys.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #26330 #69036 CARVE-Q: Quantum-Proposed, Clas... #69035 A Modular Approach to Succinct ... #69013 Quantum correlations and cohere... #68989 Quantum correlations in QBism's...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.