Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Gravity Relativistic Quantum Information
Quantum field theory measurements for relativistic particles
arXiv
Authors: Nadia Koliopoulou, Charis Anastopoulos, Ntina Savvidou
Year
2026
Paper ID
2624
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
133
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The formulation of a consistent measurement theory for relativistic quantum fields has become a problem of growing foundational and practical significance. Standard non-relativistic measurement models fail to incorporate the essential relativistic principles of locality, causality, and Lorentz covariance, and are therefore inadequate for quantum field theoretic settings. While most existing work focuses on scalar fields, realistic particles possess spin, polarization, and internal degrees of freedom that introduce new conceptual and operational challenges. To this end, we employ the Quantum Temporal Probabilities (QTP) framework for relativistic measurements to describe electromagnetic, Dirac, and internally structured scalar fields. Our results include probabilities for the time-of-arrival that take spin/polarization into account, generalized photodetection formulas beyond Glauber's theory, an unambiguous derivation of the particle oscillation formula together with its limitations, and a first-principles analysis of relativistic qudits.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Gravity & Relativistic Quantum Information research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The formulation of a consistent measurement theory for relativistic quantum fields has become a problem of growing foundational and practical significance.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.