Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Simulation

Parametric squeezing amplification of Bose-Einstein condensates

arXiv
Authors: Georg Jäger, Tarik Berrada, Jörg Schmiedmayer, Thorsten Schumm, Ulrich Hohenester

Year

2015

Paper ID

26217

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

93

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We theoretically investigate the creation of squeezed states of a Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC) trapped in a magnetic double well potential. The number or phase squeezed states are created by modulating the tunnel coupling between the two wells periodically with twice the Josephson frequency, i.e., through parametric amplification. Simulations are performed with the multi configurational Hartree method for bosons (MCTDHB). We employ optimal control theory to bring the condensate to a complete halt at a final time, thus creating a highly squeezed state squeezing factor of 0.12, $ξS2=-18$ dB suitable for atom interferometry.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We theoretically investigate the creation of squeezed states of a Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC) trapped in a magnetic double well potential.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #26217 #69599 Tensor network compression usin... #69590 Quantum Simulation of Spin-Depe... #69578 Fourier analysis of quantum neu... #69576 Efficient Simulation of Szegedy...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.