Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Photonic Quantum Computing

Critical behaviour of coherence and correlation of counterpropagating twin beams

arXiv
Authors: Tommaso Corti, Enrico Brambilla, Alessandra Gatti

Year

2015

Paper ID

26107

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

76

Citations

N/A

Abstract

This work analyses the temporal coherence and correlation of twin beams generated in a quasi-phase matched nonlinear crystal in a counterpropagating configuration, ranging from the low-gain regime, where counterpropagating photon pairs are generated spontaneously, to the regime of stimulated pair production, close to the MOPO (Mirrorless Optical Parametric Oscillator) threshold. Here we show a critical divergence of the correlation time and slowing down of quantum fluctuations originating from the feedback mechanism responsible of the MOPO threshold.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Photonic Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • This work analyses the temporal coherence and correlation of twin beams generated in a quasi-phase matched nonlinear crystal in a counterpropagating configuration, ranging from...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #26107 #68456 Analytic Properties of the Jost... #68455 Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Typ... #68453 Weak wave turbulence as a precu... #68449 Scale-Invariant Open Quantum Sy...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.