Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Device independent witnessing of unknown quantum channels
arXiv
Authors: Michele Dall'Arno, Sarah Brandsen, Francesco Buscemi
Year
2015
Paper ID
26088
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
95
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum process tomography, the standard procedure to characterize any quantum channel in nature, is affected by a circular argument: in order to characterize the channel, the tomographic preparation and measurement need in turn to be already characterized. We break this loop by designing an operational framework able to optimally characterize any given unknown quantum channel in a device-independent fashion, namely, by only looking at its input-output statistics, under the sole assumption that quantum theory is valid. We provide explicit solutions, in closed form, for practically relevant cases such as the erasure, depolarizing, and amplitude-damping channels.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum process tomography, the standard procedure to characterize any quantum channel in nature, is affected by a circular argument: in order to characterize the channel, the...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.