Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Phase context decomposition of diagonal unitaries for higher-dimensional systems
arXiv
Authors: Kerstin Beer, Friederike Anna Dziemba
Year
2015
Paper ID
26070
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
104
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We generalize an efficient decomposition method for diagonal operators by Welch et al. to qudit systems. The phase-context aware method focusses on cascaded entanglers whose decomposition into multi-controlled INC-gates can be optimized by the choice of a proper signed base-d representation for the natural numbers. While the gate count of the best known decomposition method for general diagonal operators on qubit systems scales with mathcal{O}\(2n\), the circuits synthesized by the Welch algorithm for diagonal operators with k distinct phases are upper-bounded by mathcal{O}\(n2k\), which is generalized to mathcal{O}\(dn2k\) for the qudit case in this paper.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We generalize an efficient decomposition method for diagonal operators by Welch et al.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.