Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Cryptography Security
Quantum Key Distribution in the Non-Asymptotic Regime
arXiv
Authors: Ramona Wolf
Year
2015
Paper ID
26038
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
131
Citations
N/A
Abstract
This is a Bachelor's thesis on quantum key distribution in the non-asymptotic regime submitted to the Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany. It deals with the question how to generate a key to encrypt messages between two honest parties that an eavesdropper does not gain any information about. The purpose of this thesis is to give an overview over the current state of the prepare and measure quantum key distribution protocol and its security proof with a specific focus on the non-asymptotic case. Therefore, we present the different steps of the protocol and retrace them with the help of the BB84-protocol. Afterwards, the security proof of this protocol is introduced and in the end, we have a closer look at the quantum capacity and calculate it for the amplitude damping channel.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Cryptography & Security research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- This is a Bachelor's thesis on quantum key distribution in the non-asymptotic regime submitted to the Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.