Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Device Fabrication Process Engineering

The Effective Interaction Strength in a Bose-Einstein Condensate of Photons in a Dye-Filled Microcavity

arXiv
Authors: S. Greveling, F. van der Laan, K. L. Perrier, D. van Oosten

Year

2017

Paper ID

2601

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

120

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We experimentally study Bose-Einstein condensation of photons (phBEC) in a dye-filled microcavity. Through multiple absorption and emission cycles the photons inside the microcavity thermalize to the rovibronic temperature of the dye solution. Raising the photon density of the thermalized photon gas beyond the critical photon density yields a macroscopic occupation of the ground state, i.e. phBEC. For increasing density, we observe an increase of the condensate radius which we attribute to effective repulsive interactions. For several dye concentrations we accurately determine the radius of the condensate as a function of the number of condensate photons, and derive an effective interaction strength parameter {g}. For all concentrations we find {g} sim 10-2, one order larger than previously reported.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Device Fabrication & Process Engineering research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We experimentally study Bose-Einstein condensation of photons (phBEC) in a dye-filled microcavity.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #2601

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.