Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Site and bond percolation thresholds in Kn,n-based lattices: Vulnerability of quantum annealers to random qubit and coupler failures on chimera topologies
arXiv
Authors: O. Melchert, Helmut G. Katzgraber, M. A. Novotny
Year
2015
Paper ID
26005
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
145
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We estimate the critical thresholds of bond and site percolation on nonplanar, effectively two-dimensional graphs with chimera like topology. The building blocks of these graphs are complete and symmetric bipartite subgraphs of size 2n, referred to as Kn,n graphs. For the numerical simulations we use an efficient union-find based algorithm and employ a finite-size scaling analysis to obtain the critical properties for both bond and site percolation. We report the respective percolation thresholds for different sizes of the bipartite subgraph and verify that the associated universality class is that of standard two-dimensional percolation. For the canonical chimera graph used in the D-Wave Systems Inc. quantum annealer $n = 4$, we discuss device failure in terms of network vulnerability, i.e., we determine the critical fraction of qubits and couplers that can be absent due to random failures prior to losing large-scale connectivity throughout the device.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We estimate the critical thresholds of bond and site percolation on nonplanar, effectively two-dimensional graphs with chimera like topology.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.