Quick Navigation
Topics
Error Mitigation Nisq Performance
Segmented Composite Design of Robust Single-Qubit Quantum Gates
arXiv
Authors: Ido Kaplan, Muhammad Erew, Yonatan Piasetzky, Moshe Goldstein, Yaron Oz, Haim Suchowski
Year
2022
Paper ID
260
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
192
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Error mitigation schemes and error-correcting codes have been the center of much effort in quantum information processing research over the last few decades. While most of the successful proposed schemes for error mitigation are perturbative in the noise and assume deterministic systematic errors, studies of the problem considering the full noise and errors distribution are still scarce. In this work, we introduce an error mitigation scheme for robust single-qubit unitary gates based on composite segmented design, which accounts for the full distribution of the physical noise and errors in the system. We provide two optimization approaches to construct these robust segmented gates: perturbative and non-perturbative, that addresses all orders of errors. We demonstrate our scheme in the photonics realm for the dual-rail directional couplers realization. We show that the 3-segmented composite design for the fundamental single-qubits unitary operations reduces the error by an order of magnitude for a realistic distribution of errors, and that the two approaches are compatible for small errors. This is shown to significantly reduce the overhead of modern error correction codes. Our methods are rather general and can be applied to other realizations of quantum information processing units.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Error Mitigation & NISQ Performance research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Error mitigation schemes and error-correcting codes have been the center of much effort in quantum information processing research over the last few decades.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.