Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Polynomials, Quantum Query Complexity, and Grothendieck's Inequality
arXiv
Authors: Scott Aaronson, Andris Ambainis, Jānis Iraids, Martins Kokainis, Juris Smotrovs
Year
2015
Paper ID
25919
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
190
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We show an equivalence between 1-query quantum algorithms and representations by degree-2 polynomials. Namely, a partial Boolean function f is computable by a 1-query quantum algorithm with error bounded by ε<1/2 iff f can be approximated by a degree-2 polynomial with error bounded by ε'<1/2. This result holds for two different notions of approximation by a polynomial: the standard definition of Nisan and Szegedy and the approximation by block-multilinear polynomials recently introduced by Aaronson and Ambainis (STOC'2015, arxiv:1411.5729). We also show two results for polynomials of higher degree. First, there is a total Boolean function which requires Ω(n) quantum queries but can be represented by a block-multilinear polynomial of degree {O}\(sqrt{n}\). Thus, in the general case (for an arbitrary number of queries), block-multilinear polynomials are not equivalent to quantum algorithms. Second, for any constant degree k, the two notions of approximation by a polynomial (the standard and the block-multilinear) are equivalent. As a consequence, we solve an open problem of Aaronson and Ambainis, showing that one can estimate the value of any bounded degree-k polynomial p:\{0, 1\}n → [-1, 1] with O\(n^{1-frac{1}{2k}}\) queries.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2015 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We show an equivalence between 1-query quantum algorithms and representations by degree-2 polynomials.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.