Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Sequence and Image Transformations with Monarq: Quantum Implementations for NISQ Devices

arXiv
Authors: Jan Balewski, Roel Van Beeumen, E. Wes Bethel, Talita Perciano

Year

2026

Paper ID

25861

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

71

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We introduce Monarq, a unified quantum data processing framework that combines QCrank encoding with the EHands protocol for polynomial transformations, and demonstrate its implementation on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware. This framework provides fundamental quantum building blocks for signal and image processing tasks, including convolution, discrete-time Fourier transform (DFT), squared gradient computation, and edge detection, serving as a reference for a broad class of data processing applications on near-term quantum devices.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We introduce Monarq, a unified quantum data processing framework that combines QCrank encoding with the EHands protocol for polynomial transformations, and demonstrate its...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #25861 #69599 Tensor network compression usin... #69595 Tantalum as a base material for... #69590 Quantum Simulation of Spin-Depe... #69589 An integrated ultrahigh vacuum ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.